Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of John L. Hobson, as Administrator, etc., 1892 — 131 N.Y. 575 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of John L. Hobson, as Administrator, etc.
131 N.Y. 575·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Account of John L. Hobson, as Administrator, etc.
(Argued January 25, 1892;
decided February 9, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made November 23, 1891, which modified and affirmed as modified a decree of the surrogate of the city and county of New York, upon the judicial settlement of the accounts of John L. Hobson, as administrator, with the will annexed ■of Sarah M. Hobson, deceased.
Thomas S. Moore for appellants.
Howard R. Bayne and Anson Maltby for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
■Judgment affirmed.