Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Margaretta Meyer Paul, Appellant, v. William H. Williams et al., as Trustees, etc., Respondents, 1892 — 136 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
Margaretta Meyer Paul, Appellant, v. William H. Williams et al., as Trustees, etc., Respondents
136 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaretta Meyer Paul, Appellant, v. William H. Williams et al., as Trustees, etc., Respondents.
(Argued November 30, 1892;
decided December 20, 1892.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Gourt in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made March 13, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
'Frank Dudd for appellant.
Miron Winslow for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.