Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Radium Dial Co. v. Ryan, Clerk of the Circuit Court of La Salle County, 1939 — 308 U.S. 504 · caselaw · US
General
Radium Dial Co. v. Ryan, Clerk of the Circuit Court of La Salle County
308 U.S. 504·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 212.
Radium Dial Co. v. Ryan, Clerk of the Circuit Court of La Salle County.
October 9, 1939.
[MAJORITY — Per Curi-am:]
Per Curi-am:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Schmidt, 177 U. S. 230, 236; Holmes v. Conway, 241 U. S. 624, 631-632; Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Glidden Co., 284 U. S. 151, 158; Snyder v. Massa chusetts, 291 U. S. 97, 105.
Messrs. Walter Bachrach and Arthur Magid for appellant. Messrs. Taylor E. Wilhelm and Leonard J. Grossman, for appellee.