Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry P. McGown, Jr., Respondent, v. Mary E. McGown (Appearing as Mary E. Bell), Appellant, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 686 · caselaw · US
General
Henry P. McGown, Jr., Respondent, v. Mary E. McGown (Appearing as Mary E. Bell), Appellant
160 N.Y. 686·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry P. McGown, Jr., Respondent, v. Mary E. McGown (Appearing as Mary E. Bell), Appellant.
(Submitted October 3, 1899;
decided October 17, 1899.)
McGown v. McGown, 40 App. Div. 633, appeal dismissed.
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered May 15, 1899, affirming an order of Special Term denying the petition of appellant for leave to apply for an order modifying a judgment of divorce as to the custody of a minor child.
Henry W. Scott for appellant.
Charles Blandy and Henry P. McGown for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, witn costs ; no opinion.
All concur.