General
Ex parte Roderick BEDDOW
27 Ala. App. 613165 So. 913·Alabama Court of Appeals·1936·AL
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
165 So. 913
Ex parte Roderick BEDDOW.
6 Div. 895.
Court of Appeals of Alabama.
Jan. 21, 1936.
Roderick Beddow, pro se.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In accordance with and in response to the mandate of the Supreme Court issued in the case of Ex parte Robert J. Wheeler, as Judge, etc., 231 Ala. 356, 165 So. 74, Supreme Court, the petition for mandamus in the above-styled cause is hereby dismissed.
In making this order, we feel it our duty to say that this, court, as such, never assumed jurisdiction of 'the mandamus proceeding, that it was never called to the attention of the court, and no action has ever been taken thereon, and, but for the mandate of the Supreme Court, above referred to, an order of dismissal would be unnecessary.
Dismissed.