Tax
ARMSTRONG et al. v. DE FOREST RADIO TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.
296 F. 466·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ARMSTRONG et al. v. DE FOREST RADIO TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH CO.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 7, 1924.)
No. 130.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Suit by Edwin H. Armstrong and the Westinghouse Electric & Manufacturing Company against the De Forest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Company. From an orddr declaring defendant in contempt, and imposing pecuniary penalties for the benefit of plaintiffs, it appeals.
Appeal dismissed.
Darby & Darby, of New York City (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and A*. Leo Everett, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Charles Neave and Stephen H. Philbin, both of New York City, for appellees.
Beforé ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Our opinion filed to-day in the case of Perfection Cooler Co. v. Rotax Co., Inc., 296 Fed. 464, completely covers this matter, and requires that the appeal be dismissed without costs.