Corporations

Samuel Goldstein v. Zoning Commission of the City of Waterbury

157 Conn. 595·Connecticut Supreme Court·1968·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Samuel Goldstein v. Zoning Commission of the City of Waterbury King, C. J., Alcorn, House, Thim and By an, Js. Argued. December 5 decided December 6, 1968 Perry Graicerstein, for the appellant (plaintiff). John F. Phelan, assistant corporation counsel, with whom, on the brief, was Vincent P. Matasavage, corporation counsel, for the appellee (defendant). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of I. R. Stich Associates, Inc. v. Town Council, 155 Conn. 1, 3, 229 A.2d 545, Kyser v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 155 Conn. 236, 241, 230 A.2d 595, and Hughes v. Town Planning & Zoning Commission, 156 Conn. 505, 507, 242 A.2d 705. There is no error.