Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Flanagan, Appellant, v. Benjamin C. Hollingsworth et al., Respondents, 1888 — 108 N.Y. 621 · caselaw · US
General
William Flanagan, Appellant, v. Benjamin C. Hollingsworth et al., Respondents
108 N.Y. 621·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Flanagan, Appellant, v. Benjamin C. Hollingsworth et al., Respondents.
(Argued December 12, 1887;
decided January 17, 1888.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the City Court of Brooklyn, made September 29, 1885, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Nathaniel O. Moah for appellant.
Josiah T. Ma/ream, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below and for judgment absolute against appellant on stipulation.
All concur; Peokham, J., in result.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.