General

In the Matter of the Application of Fanny Brice, Appellant, for an Order to Substitute Attorneys in the Place and Stead of Charles H. Studin, as Attorney for Said Fanny Brice. (Actions 1 and 2.) In the Matter of the Application of Billy Rose, Appellant, for an Order to Substitute Attorneys in the Place and Stead of Charles H. Studin as Attorney for Said Billy Rose

233 A.D. 726·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1931·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Application of Fanny Brice, Appellant, for an Order to Substitute Attorneys in the Place and Stead of Charles H. Studin, as Attorney for Said Fanny Brice. (Actions 1 and 2.) In the Matter of the Application of Billy Rose, Appellant, for an Order to Substitute Attorneys in the Place and Stead of Charles H. Studin as Attorney for Said Billy Rose. [MAJORITY] Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and, disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, McAvoy, Martin and Sherman, JJ.