General
Buffalo Industrial Bank, Respondent, v. William J. Forbes, Doing Business under the Name and Style of Forbes Distributing Company, Appellant
264 A.D. 987·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1942·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(September 30, 1942.)
Buffalo Industrial Bank, Respondent, v. William J. Forbes, Doing Business under the Name and Style of Forbes Distributing Company, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur. (The judgment reverses a judgment of the Buffalo City Court in favor of plaintiff for §125 and costs, and directs a judgment in favor of plaintiff for $386.40 and costs, in an action on a promissory note. The order is the order of reversal and dismisses defendant’s cross-appeal to County Court.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.