Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pullman-Standard, a division of Pullman, Inc. v. Swint et al.; and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Swint et al., 1981 — 451 U.S. 906 · caselaw · US
General
Pullman-Standard, a division of Pullman, Inc. v. Swint et al.; and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Swint et al.
451 U.S. 906·Supreme Court of the United States·1981
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 80-1190.
No. 80-1193.
Pullman-Standard, a division of Pullman, Inc. v. Swint et al.; and United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, et al. v. Swint et al.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by each petition, cases consolidated, and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: 624 F. 2d 525.