Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Knapp v. Arizona, 1978 — 435 U.S. 908 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
Knapp v. Arizona
435 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 77-5653.
Knapp v. Arizona.
[MAJORITY]
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Certiorari denied.
[CONCURRENCE — Mr. Justice Blackmun]
Mr. Justice Blackmun
concurs in the denial of certiorari in this case on the usual understanding that it is without prejudice to petitioner’s seeking relief by habeas corpus.
[DISSENT — Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice . Marshall,]
Mr. Justice Brennan and Mr. Justice . Marshall,
dissenting.
Adhering to our views that the death penalty is in all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U. S. 153, 227, 231 (1976), we would grant certiorari and vacate the death sentence in this case.