Torts · MBE-tested
Therese Schultz, Respondent, v. Theodor Schultz, Appellant
89 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1882·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Therese Schultz, Respondent, v. Theodor Schultz, Appellant.
(Argued May 30, 1882;
decided October 10, 1882.)
Schultz v. Schultz (37 Hun, 36), reversed.'
This was an appeal from an order of Q-eneral Term affirming an order of Special Term, which denied a motion to vacate an order of arrest herein.
The action was by a wife against her husband to recover damages for assault and battery.
Benno Loewy for appellant.
L. Ansbacher for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to reverse order and to dismiss complaint. No opinion.
All concur, except Raheorth, J., who reads for affirmance, and Fihoh, J., who concurs therein.
Qrdered accordingly.