Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MISSOURI ex rel. JOHNSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, et al. v. CLAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF DIVISION OF INSURANCE, et al., 1963 — 371 U.S. 577 · caselaw · US
General
MISSOURI ex rel. JOHNSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, et al. v. CLAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF DIVISION OF INSURANCE, et al.
371 U.S. 577·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MISSOURI ex rel. JOHNSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, et al. v. CLAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF DIVISION OF INSURANCE, et al.
No. 607.
Decided January 21, 1963.
Walter A. Raymond for appellants.
Thomas F. Eagleton, Attorney General of Missouri, Harry H. Kay, Special Assistant Attorney General, and John C. Baumann for Clay, and James M. Douglas and William G. Guerri for Aetna Insurance Co., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions to dismiss are granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.