General
Samuel T. Sudlow et al., Respondents v. George W. Mead, Appellant
109 N.Y. 643·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel T. Sudlow et al., Respondents v. George W. Mead, Appellant.
(Argued April 10, 1887;
decided April 17, 1888.)
Appeals from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made December 17, 1886, affirming an order of Special Term, allowing the plaintiff leave to issue execution, etc.
Sewall Sergeant for appellant.
R. M. Martin for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.