General

W. W. BRUCE, Respondent, v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF OAKLAND et al., Appellants

6 Cal. App. 2d 761·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1935·CA

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

[Civ. No. 9663. First Appellate District, Division One. May 7, 1935.] W. W. BRUCE, Respondent, v. CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF OAKLAND et al., Appellants. F. Bert Fernhoff, City Attorney, and John W. Collier, Deputy City Attorney, for Appellants. Decoto & St. Sure for Respondent. [MAJORITY — THE COURT.] THE COURT. Appeal from the Superior Court of the County of Alameda enjoining examination by Civil Service Board. For the reasons given in the consolidated case (ante, p. 633 [45 Pac. (2d) 419]) number 9594 the judgment of the superior court enjoining the holding of the examination, pending the determination of the mandamus proceeding is affirmed.