Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Warfield Company v. American Lecithin Co.; and American Lecithin Co. v. Warfield Company, 1939 — 308 U.S. 609 · caselaw · US
General
Warfield Company v. American Lecithin Co.; and American Lecithin Co. v. Warfield Company
308 U.S. 609·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 376.
No. 455.
Warfield Company v. American Lecithin Co.; and American Lecithin Co. v. Warfield Company.
November 13, 1939.
Messrs. Russell Wiles and George A. Chritton for the Warfield Company. Messrs. Thomas G. Haight, Edward G. Curtis, Daniel L. Morris, and Ira J. Wilson for the American Lecithin Co. By leave of Court,Messrs. George P. Dike and Cedric W. Porter filed a brief on behalf of the Dewey & Almy Chemical Co., as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of cer-tiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit denied.
Reported below: 105 F. 2d 207.