Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
International Harvester Co. et al. v. City of Kansas City, Kansas, et al., 1963 — 371 U.S. 948 · caselaw · US
General
International Harvester Co. et al. v. City of Kansas City, Kansas, et al.
371 U.S. 948·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 550.
International Harvester Co. et al. v. City of Kansas City, Kansas, et al.
Frederick Bernays Wiener and J. Donald Lysaught for petitioners.
Charles S. Rhyne, Thomas P. Brown III and Alfred J. Tig he, Jr. for respondents.
William M. Ferguson, Attorney General of Kansas, for the State of Kansas, as amicus curiae, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.