Corporations
Stuyvesant Construction Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Fing Holding Corporation et al., Defendants, and Bremer Tool Corporation et al., Defendants-Appellants
268 A.D. 856·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1944·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Stuyvesant Construction Corporation et al., Respondents, v. Fing Holding Corporation et al., Defendants, and Bremer Tool Corporation et al., Defendants-Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The bill of particulars to be served within ten days after service of order with notice of entry thereof. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ. [See post, pp. 894, 903.] Leann Ficarrotto et al., Appellants, v. Mary McEachern et al., Defendants, and Marvin G. Conn ally, Defendant-Respondent.— Order, so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. The date for the examination to proceed to be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.