Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SPENCER KELLOGG & SONS, Inc., Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Tug TOURIST, Her Engines, etc., the Canal Boats H. M. Stagg, Rose O'Boyle, Hammond Brothers and Lake Superior, and the Machinery, etc., of Each of Said Canal Boats, Respondents Appellees, Helen Hammond, as Administratrix of the Estate of John J. Hammond, Deceased, and Anthony O'Boyle, Claimants Appellees, and American Linseed Company, Intervener Appellee, 1928 — 25 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
General
SPENCER KELLOGG & SONS, Inc., Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Tug TOURIST, Her Engines, etc., the Canal Boats H. M. Stagg, Rose O'Boyle, Hammond Brothers and Lake Superior, and the Machinery, etc., of Each of Said Canal Boats, Respondents Appellees, Helen Hammond, as Administratrix of the Estate of John J. Hammond, Deceased, and Anthony O'Boyle, Claimants Appellees, and American Linseed Company, Intervener Appellee
25 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SPENCER KELLOGG & SONS, Inc., Libelant Appellant, v. Steam Tug TOURIST, Her Engines, etc., the Canal Boats H. M. Stagg, Rose O’Boyle, Hammond Brothers and Lake Superior, and the Machinery, etc., of Each of Said Canal Boats, Respondents Appellees, Helen Hammond, as Administratrix of the Estate of John J. Hammond, Deceased, and Anthony O’Boyle, Claimants Appellees, and American Linseed Company, Intervener Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 9, 1928.
Nos. 240-244.
Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York.
Dudley, Stowe & Sawyer, of Buffalo, N. Y., for appellant.
Thomas C. Burke, of New York City, for libelant appellee.
Stanley & Gidley, of Buffalo, N. Y. (Ray M. Stanley and Ellis H. Gidley, both of Buffalo, N. Y., of counsel), for interveners appellees and respondents appellees.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree (16 F.[2d] 154) affirmed.