Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v. John Brennan et al., Respondents, 1900 — 163 N.Y. 584 · caselaw · US
General
The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v. John Brennan et al., Respondents
163 N.Y. 584·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, v. John Brennan et al., Respondents.
A. T. O. & R. R. R. R. Oo. v. Brennan, 34 App. Div. 848, affirmed.
(Argued May 22, 1900;
decided June 5, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate' Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 24,1897, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon an order of the court at a Trial Term, granting a motion for a nonsuit.
Frank Hiscock for appellant.
William G. Tracy for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Landon and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Gray, J.