Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People ex rel. Isaac P. Martin, Appellant, v. Theodore W. Myers et al., as the Board of Revision and Correction of Assessment Lists, Respondents, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 627 · caselaw · US
General
The People ex rel. Isaac P. Martin, Appellant, v. Theodore W. Myers et al., as the Board of Revision and Correction of Assessment Lists, Respondents
133 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Isaac P. Martin, Appellant, v. Theodore W. Myers et al., as the Board of Revision and Correction of Assessment Lists, Respondents.
(Argued April 25, 1892,
decided May 6, 1892.)
Appeal from order or the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March 15, 1892, which dismissed a writ of certiorari brought to review the action of the Board of Revision and Correction of the Assessment Lists of the city of Eew York in confirming an assessment against the relator for macadamizing Kingsbridge road,
James A. Peering for appellant.
Pamid J. Pean for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss, appeal; no opinion,
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.