Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William C. Breed et al., as Receivers of The New York National Building and Loan Association, Appellants, v. Leonard Ruoff, Sr., et al., Respondents, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 612 · caselaw · US
General
William C. Breed et al., as Receivers of The New York National Building and Loan Association, Appellants, v. Leonard Ruoff, Sr., et al., Respondents
166 N.Y. 612·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William C. Breed et al., as Receivers of The New York National Building and Loan Association, Appellants, v. Leonard Ruoff, Sr., et al., Respondents.
Breed v. Ruoff, 54 App. Div. 142, appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 8, 1901;
decided March 22, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered in favor of defendant December 14, 1900, upon the submission of a controversy, under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
G. D. B. Hasbrouck and Russel S. Johnson for appellants.
Thaddeus D. Kenneson for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.