General
B. Altman & Co. v. United States
17 Cust. Ct. 417·United States Customs Court·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
B. Altman & Co. v. United States
No. 6520.
Entry No. 744289.
Invoice dated London, England, February 8, 1946.
Certified February 1946.
Entered at New York, N. Y., March 15, 1946.
(Decided November 15, 1946)
Marlow & Hines for the plaintiff.
Paul P. Rao, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Tilson, Judge:]
Tilson, Judge:
In the appeal listed above counsel for the respective parties have agreed that the issues herein are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in United States v. Pitcairn, C. A. D. 334, and the record therein has been admitted in evidence herein.
Upon the agreed facts and following the cited authority, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the values found by the appraiser, less any additions made by the importer on entry to meet advances made by the appraiser in similar cases then pending on appeal. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.