Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Charles J. Ahrenfeldt, as Executor, etc., Respondent; Frederika Ohrtmann et al., Appellants, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 574 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Charles J. Ahrenfeldt, as Executor, etc., Respondent; Frederika Ohrtmann et al., Appellants
149 N.Y. 574·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Charles J. Ahrenfeldt, as Executor, etc., Respondent; Frederika Ohrtmann et al., Appellants.
In re Account of Ahrenfeldt, 91 Hun, 638, affirmed.
(Argued April 6, 1896;
decided April 21, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made September' 9 1895, which affirmed an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county striking out objections to an executor’s accounts.
Nathan Ottinger for appellants.
David Willcox, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.