Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Simonsen v. Emmerling, Trustee; Emmerling, Trustee, v. Schroeder; and Emmerling, Trustee, v. Schroeder et al., 1950 — 339 U.S. 978 · caselaw · US
Securities
Simonsen v. Emmerling, Trustee; Emmerling, Trustee, v. Schroeder; and Emmerling, Trustee, v. Schroeder et al.
339 U.S. 978·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 740. No. 761. No. 762.
Simonsen v. Emmerling, Trustee; Emmerling, Trustee, v. Schroeder; and Emmerling, Trustee, v. Schroeder et al.
C. A. 7th Cir.
Max E. Geline for petitioner in No. 740.
Jackson M. Bruce for petitioner in Nos. 761 and 762 and respondent in No. 740.
Ralph M. Hoyt for respondents in Nos. 761 and 762.
Solicitor General Perlman, Roger S. Foster, David Ferber and W. Victor Rodin filed a memorandum for the Securities & Exchange Commission supporting the petitioner in Nos. 761 and 762 and respondent in No. 740.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari denied.