Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Prudence-Bonds Corp. v. Silbiger et al., 1950 — 340 U.S. 831 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Prudence-Bonds Corp. v. Silbiger et al.
340 U.S. 831·Supreme Court of the United States·1950
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion the petition should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 52.
Prudence-Bonds Corp. v. Silbiger et al.
Charles M. McCarty for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman filed a memorandum for the Reconstruction Finance Corporation, respondent, and for the Securities & Exchange Commission, as amicus curiae, supporting the petition. Samuel Silbiger, pro se; Frank L. Weil for Weil; and Lester H. Marks for Miller, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion the petition should be granted.