Contracts · MBE-tested
Risk Control Associates, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. Maloof, Lebowitz, Connahan & Oleske, P.C., et al., Respondents-Appellants
148 A.D.3d 44047 N.Y.S.3d 906·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2017·NY
Concur — Acosta, J.R, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Webber, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Risk Control Associates, Inc., et al., Appellants-Respondents, v Maloof, Lebowitz, Connahan & Oleske, P.C., et al., Respondents-Appellants.
[47 NYS3d 906]
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Joan M. Kenney, J.), entered on or about February 11, 2016, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, and denied defendants’ application for sanctions, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The factual allegations and the damages sought in the instant action are the same as the factual allegations underlying the legal malpractice claims and the damages sought in an earlier action brought against defendants by plaintiff Risk Control Associates, Inc., the claims administrator for plaintiff National Specialty Insurance Company (Risk Control Assoc. Ins. Group v Maloof, Lebowitz, Connahan & Oleske, P.C., 127 AD3d 500 [1st Dept 2015]; see Voutsas v Hochberg, 103 AD3d 445, 446 [1st Dept 2013], lv denied 22 NY3d 853 [2013]). The instant claims are also time-barred (see CPLR 214 [6]).
Upon consideration of all the circumstances, we decline to impose sanctions against plaintiffs.
Concur — Acosta, J.R, Richter, Manzanet-Daniels, Gische and Webber, JJ.