General
Julius Briefer, Respondent, v. Joseph A. Stoll et al., Appellants
177 N.Y. 577·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Briefer, Respondent, v. Joseph A. Stoll et al., Appellants.
Briefer v. Stoll, 80 App. Div. 626, affirmed.'
(Submitted January 29, 1904;
decided February 9, 1904.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 27,1903, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Wilson B. Brice for appellants.
Jacol) Rieger for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs and ten per cent damages, under section 3251 of the Code of Civil Procedure; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.