Contracts · MBE-tested
In the Matter of Mary DEROCHE; Eric Deroche, Debtors, Mary Deroche; Eric Deroche, Appellants, v. Arizona Industrial Commission, Appellee
525 F.3d 821·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·2008
Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and JANE A. RESTANI, Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Mary DEROCHE; Eric Deroche, Debtors, Mary Deroche; Eric Deroche, Appellants, v. Arizona Industrial Commission, Appellee.
No. 04-15258.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 6, 2008.
Allan D. Newdelman, Attorney at Law, Phoenix, AZ, Roberta J. Sunkin, Brown & Sunkin, P.C., Chandler, AZ, for Debtors/Appellants.
Denise Ann Faulk, Robert I. Hall, April Theis, Arizona Attorney General’s Office, Phoenix, AZ, for Appellee.
Before: STEPHEN REINHARDT and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and JANE A. RESTANI, Judge.
The Honorable Jane A. Restani, Chief Judge, United States Court of International Trade, sitting by designation.
[MAJORITY]
ORDER
This case is hereby resubmitted. Pursuant to the judgment of the United States Supreme Court issued on March 20, 2007 in Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 1199, 167 L.Ed.2d 178 (2007), we vacate our opinion at 434 F.3d 1188 (9th Cir.2006), vacate the district court’s decision as well as the bankruptcy court’s decision, and remand to the district court with instructions to remand to the bankruptcy court for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court. We express no opinion on any other issue presented by the parties, leaving those questions for consideration of the bankruptcy court in the first instance.