Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Albert S. FANT, as State Bank Examiner of the State of South Carolina, Appellant, v. Ira KRUPNICK, Appellee, 1932 — 59 F.2d 1059 · caselaw · US
General
Albert S. FANT, as State Bank Examiner of the State of South Carolina, Appellant, v. Ira KRUPNICK, Appellee
59 F.2d 1059·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Albert S. FANT, as State Bank Examiner of the State of South Carolina, Appellant, v. Ira KRUPNICK, Appellee.
No. 3305.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
April 29, 1932.
See, also, 21 F.(2d) 182.
E. E. Whitehurst, of Columbia, S. C., for appellant.
Christie Benet, of Columbia, S. C., and L. K. Legge, of Charleston, S. C., for appel-lee.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
Case dismissed on motion of appellee.