Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anchor Brewing Company, Appellant, v. The Village of Dobbs Ferry, Respondent, 1898 — 156 N.Y. 695 · caselaw · US
General
Anchor Brewing Company, Appellant, v. The Village of Dobbs Ferry, Respondent
156 N.Y. 695·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anchor Brewing Company, Appellant, v. The Village of Dobbs Ferry, Respondent.
Anchor Brewing Go. v. Dobbs Ferry, 84 Hun, 374, affirmed.
(Argued June 10, 1898;
decided June 24, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered February 23, 1895, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a decision of the court dismissing the complaint upon the merits, on trial at Special Term.
Eugene Treadwell, Henry L. Scheuerman and Alfred Lauterbach for appellant.
W. J. Townsend for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.