Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David Leon RILEY, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA., 2014 — 571 U.S. 1161 · caselaw · US
Constitutional Law · MBE-tested
David Leon RILEY, petitioner, v. CALIFORNIA.
571 U.S. 1161187 L. Ed. 2d 847·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David Leon RILEY, petitioner,
v.
CALIFORNIA.
No. 13-132.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jan. 17, 2014.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate District, Division One, granted limited to the following question: Whether evidence admitted at petitioner's trial was obtained in a search of petitioner's cell phone that violated petitioner's Fourth Amendment rights.