General
Marie Duffy, as Guardian ad Litem of Ethel Duffy, et al., Appellants, v. Luther Banks et al., Respondents; Luther Banks, Plaintiff, v. Star Bus Lines, Inc., et al., Defendants
15 A.D.2d 663·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1962·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Marie Duffy, as Guardian ad Litem of Ethel Duffy, et al., Appellants, v. Luther Banks et al., Respondents. Luther Banks, Plaintiff, v. Star Bus Lines, Inc., et al., Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
In our opinion, under all the circumstances, the exercise of a sound discretion and the interests of justice require that plaintiffs be allowed to serve the proposed supplemental complaint and bill of particulars upon the conditions stated (cf. Poplar v. Bourjois, Inc., 298 N. Y. 62, 67; Wagner v. Mittendorf, 232 N. Y. 481; Matter of Dickerson v. Essex County, 2 A D 2d 516, 519-520; Brewster v. Brewster Co., 138 App. Div. 139, 140). Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.