Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE Petitioner, v. GIRARD TRUST COMPANY and Joseph L. Woolston, Executors of the Estate of Beulah H. L. Woolston, Respondents, 1929 — 35 F.2d 343 · caselaw · US
Tax
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE Petitioner, v. GIRARD TRUST COMPANY and Joseph L. Woolston, Executors of the Estate of Beulah H. L. Woolston, Respondents
35 F.2d 343·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE Petitioner, v. GIRARD TRUST COMPANY and Joseph L. Woolston, Executors of the Estate of Beulah H. L. Woolston, Respondents.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
October 3, 1929.
No. 4025.
Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and Randolph C. Shaw, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, and Prew Savoy, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for petitioner.
Cuthbert H. Latta, Jr., John S. Sinclair and John Snowdon Rhoads, all of Philadelphia, Pa., for respondents.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed, on authority of United States v. Provident Trust Co., of Pennsylvania et al. (C. C. A.) 35 F.(2d) 339.