Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
B. R. NORVELL et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1928 — 24 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
General
B. R. NORVELL et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
24 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
B. R. NORVELL et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 12, 1928.
No. 5120.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Louisiana; Benjamin C. Dawkins, Judge.
S. L. Herold, of Shreveport, La. (Thigpen, Herold, Lee & Cousin, of Shreveport, La., on the brief), for appellants.
Philip H. Mecom, U. S. Atty., of Shreveport, La. (J. Pair Hardin, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Shreveport, La., on the brief), for the United States.
Before WALKEE, BEYAN, and POS-TEE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
In this case we are content to adopt the opinion of the District Court reported in 20 P.(2d) 670. The judgment is affirmed.