Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
CHEVY CHASE DAIRY, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. Otho MULLINEAUX, 1934 — 71 F.2d 985 · caselaw · US
Corporations
CHEVY CHASE DAIRY, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. Otho MULLINEAUX
71 F.2d 985·United States District Court for the District of Columbia·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CHEVY CHASE DAIRY, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. Otho MULLINEAUX.
No. 5926.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Decided May 28, 1934.
Stanley H. Fischer, Leroy S. Bendheim, and Norman Fischer, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
James A. O’Shea, John H. Burnett, and Alfred Goldstein, all of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — HITZ, Associate Justice.]
HITZ, Associate Justice.
This case is governed by Chevy Chase Dairy, Inc., v. Mullineaux, 63 App. D. C. 259, 71 F. (2d) 982, and for the reasons therein stated the judgment herein is affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed.