Corporations
JAMISON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
47 App. D.C. 411·Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia·1918·DC
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
JAMISON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
This appeal is governed by the decision of the Court in Hunter v. District of Columbia, ante, 406.
No. 3122.
Submitted January 8, 1918,
Decided March 4, 1918.
Hearing on an appeal from a judgment of the Police Court of the District of Columbia, convicting the defendants of the • crime of unlawful assembly.
Reversed and remanded.
The facts are staled in the opinion.
Mr. Mailhew E. O'Brien and Mr. Dudley Field Malone for the plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Conrad, 11. Syme, Corporation Counsel, Mr. Francis 11. Stephens, and Mr. Ringgold Hart, Assistants, for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Van Ojbsdkl]
Mr. Justice Van Ojbsdkl
delivered the opinion of the Court:
This appeal was heard in connection with No. 3121, Hunter v. District of Columbia, ante, 406. As in the former case, plaintiffs in error were convicted of the crime of unlawful assembly upon an information charging the offense in the same language.
For the reasons stated in our opinion in that case, the judgment is reversed, with costs. Reversed.