Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Maria Schuessler et al., Respondents, v. The Fire Insurance Company of the County of Philadelphia, Appellant, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 514 · caselaw · US
General
Maria Schuessler et al., Respondents, v. The Fire Insurance Company of the County of Philadelphia, Appellant
182 N.Y. 514·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maria Schuessler et al., Respondents, v. The Fire Insurance Company of the County of Philadelphia, Appellant.
(Submitted May 29, 1905;
decided June 6, 1905.)
Reported below, 103 App. Div. 12.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 21, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the judgment of affirmance by the Appellate Division was unanimous, and, therefore, not appealable to the Court of Appeals; that no permission to appeal had been granted, and that the exceptions were frivolous.
Alexander S. Bacon for motion.
George Richards opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.