Tax

Henry v. Mississippi

388 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1967

Mr. Justice Black concurs in the denial of respondent’s motions.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

June 12, 1967. No. 6, October Term, 1964. Henry v. Mississippi. [MAJORITY] Respondent’s motions that this Court reinstate the judgment of conviction and retax costs are denied. It is noted that the opinion of the Mississippi Supreme Court states: “If this case were again before us, we would reaffirm our former opinion and judgment.” Further proceedings in the cause should be addressed to any new final judgment which may be entered by the Mississippi courts. Cf. United States v. Shotwell Mfg. Co., 355 U. S. 233, 245-246; Campbell v. United States, 365 U. S. 85, 99. Mr. Justice Black concurs in the denial of respondent’s motions. [For earlier orders herein, see, e. g., 381 U. S. 908.]