Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jacob James, Appellant, v. Emma E. Jacobs et al., Respondents, 1895 — 147 N.Y. 710 · caselaw · US
General
Jacob James, Appellant, v. Emma E. Jacobs et al., Respondents
147 N.Y. 710·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jacob James, Appellant, v. Emma E. Jacobs et al., Respondents.
Reported below, 71 Hun, 176.
(Argued October 10, 1895;
decided October 29, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 2, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants, entered upon the report of a referee.
F. J. Brown for appellant.
Stephen B. Jacobs for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
•Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
All concur.