Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The Board of Supervisors of Richmond County, Respondents, v. Peter S. Wandel, Appellant, 1874 — 59 N.Y. 645 · caselaw · US
General
The Board of Supervisors of Richmond County, Respondents, v. Peter S. Wandel, Appellant
59 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Board of Supervisors of Richmond County, Respondents, v. Peter S. Wandel, Appellant.
(Argued December 1, 1874;
decided December 15, 1874.)
Reported below,-G Lansing, 33.
S.F. Rawson for the appellant.
T. Westervelt for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion in court below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.