Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. BALES OF COTTON MARKED J. H. B., 1868 — 154 U.S. 556 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES v. BALES OF COTTON MARKED J. H. B.
154 U.S. 55618 L. Ed. 889·Supreme Court of the United States·1868
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. BALES OF COTTON MARKED J. H. B.
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA.
No. 146.
Argued March 26, 1868.
Decided March 30, 1868.
Reversed on the Authority of Union Ins. Go. v. United States, 6 Wall. 759.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. Attorney General and Mr. J. Hubley Ashton for the appellants.
No appearance for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Chase]
Mr. Chief Justice Chase
delivered the opinion of the court.
The libel in the Circuit Court was filed under the act of August 6, 1861, and stated a case of seizure on land.
In conformity, therefore, with the principles settled in the case of The Union Insurance Company v. The United States, the decree of the Circuit Court must be reversed as irregular, and the cause remanded for a new trial, conformed, in respect to trial by jury and exceptions to evidence, to the course of the common law.
Reversed.