Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. John C. HAITHCOX, Appellee, 1933 — 64 F.2d 1021 · caselaw · US
General
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. John C. HAITHCOX, Appellee
64 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Appellant, v. John C. HAITHCOX, Appellee.
No. 3467.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
April 12, 1933.
J. R. McCrary, U. S. Atty., and Thomas C. Carter, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Greensboro, N. C.
II. Grady Goode and Walter Hoyle, both of Charlotte, N. G., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PEE CUEIAM.]
PEE CUEIAM.
Case dismissed under rule 20 by agreement of counsel.