Contracts · MBE-tested
United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co. et al.
355 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Me. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 11,
October Term, 1956.
December 16, 1957.
United States Gypsum Co. v. National Gypsum Co. et al.,
Bruce Bromley, Cranston Spray, Robert C. Keck, John D. Calhoun and Hugh Lynch, Jr. for appellant-movant. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen, Charles H. Weston and Edward Knuff for the United States, and Samuel I. Rosenman, Elmer E. Finck, Seymour D. Lewis, Malcolm A. Hofjmann and Seymour Krieger for the National Gypsum Co., appellees.
Me. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.
[MAJORITY]
352 U. S. 457. The motion of appellant for recall and modification of the judgment is denied without prejudice to the Solicitor General moving to dissolve the three-judge district court.