General
NICHOLS v. HARDEGREE
202 Ala. 13279 So. 598·Alabama Supreme Court·1918·AL
ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS,' JJ., concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(79 South. 598)
NICHOLS v. HARDEGREE.
(7 Div. 845.)
(Supreme Court of Alabama.
June 27, 1918.)
Appeal and Error <&wkey;753(2) — Failure to Assign Errors — Affirmance — Rule of Court.
Under Supreme Court Practice Rules, No. 1 (20 South; iv), appellant’s failure to assign any errors requires affirmance.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; Hugh D. Merrill, Judge.
Action between J. T. Nichols and R. M. Hardegree. From judgment for the latter, the former .appeals.
Affirmed.
Lackey & Rowland, of Ashland, for appellant. Merrill & Cornelius, of Ashland, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — McOLELLAN, j.]
McOLELLAN, j.
The failure of the appellant to assign any errors requires the affirmance of the judgment below. Rule 1, Supreme Court Prac. (20 South. iv); Civil Code, p. 1506; Pettibone v. Bank, 156 Ala. 666, 46 South. 751; Amerson v. Corona Coal Co., 194 Ala. 175, 69 South. 601; Kinnon v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 187 Ala. 480, 65 South. 397; Dickens v. Dickens, 174 Ala. 345, 56 South. 809; Brahan v. Collins, Minor, 169; Chavers v. Mayo, ante, p. 128, 79 South. 594.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and THOMAS,' JJ., concur.