Torts · MBE-tested
In the Matter of the Petition of Thomas W. Fitzgerald, Respondent, That This Court Will Require His Attorneys, Daniel O'Reilly and Others, Doing Business as O'Reilly, Weill & Weill, Appellants, to Deliver Over to the Petitioner Moneys Which They Have Collected While Acting as His Attorneys in the Matter of a Certain Claim for Damages against Joline & Robinson, as Receivers of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company, for the Death of the Petitioner's Son by Reason of the Negligence of the Said Railway Company
134 A.D. 968·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1909·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Thomas W. Fitzgerald, Respondent, That This Court Will Require His Attorneys, Daniel O’Reilly and Others, Doing Business as O’Reilly, Weill & Weill, Appellants, to Deliver Over to the Petitioner Moneys Which They Have Collected While Acting as His Attorneys in the Matter of a Certain Claim for Damages against Joline & Robinson, as Receivers of the Metropolitan Street Railway Company, for the Death of the Petitioner’s Son by Reason of the Negligence of the Said Railway Company.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion.