General
In the Matter of Samuel Kessler, Respondent, against Paul E. Schmittman, as Highway Superintendent of the Town of Putnam Valley, et al., Appellants
274 A.D. 1069·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1949·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Samuel Kessler, Respondent, against Paul E. Schmittman, as Highway Superintendent of the Town of Putnam Valley, et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Pinal order, in a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, prohibiting the respondent highway superintendent from assessing the cost of removal of a stone wall from petitioner’s property as an obstruction to the adjoining roadway, unanimously affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.