General
James H. Ryan and Duncan Thompson, Appellants, v. Francesco Pistone, Respondent
157 N.Y. 705·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James H. Ryan and Duncan Thompson, Appellants, v. Francesco Pistone, Respondent.
Ryan v. Pistone, 89 Hun, 78, affirmed.
(Submitted November 22, 1898;
decided December 6, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered August 6, 1895, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict, and granting a new trial.
Ralph Iliclcox for appellants.
Raymond G. Raff for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the plaintiffs on the stipulation, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.