Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
J. H. CONWAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1933 — 63 F.2d 998 · caselaw · US
General
J. H. CONWAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
63 F.2d 998·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
J. H. CONWAY, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 6989.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 24, 1933.
R. F. Sweet, of Anchorage, Alaska, and A. J. Dimond, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
W. N. Cuddy, U. S. Atty., of Valdez, Alaska, Clyde R. Ellis, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Cordova, Alaska, J. L. Reed, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Seward, Alaska, and I. M. Peckham, U. S. Atty., and Robert B. McMillan, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause being called for argument, and motion being made on behalf of appellant for continuance of the cause for hearing •or for submission on briefs to be filed, and • counsel for appellee stating that no brief for .appellant had been filed, and moving the ■court for dismissal of the appeal, it is ordered that the motion of appellant be denied, •and motion of appellee granted, and cause dismissed for failure of appellant to file brief as required by rule 24 of the Rules of Practice of this court.